<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to revamp WA Blog Point System?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtsdecoded.com/2007/12/time-to-revamp-wa-blog-point-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtsdecoded.com/2007/12/time-to-revamp-wa-blog-point-system/</link>
	<description>If you can dream it, we can do it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:53:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bipin</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtsdecoded.com/2007/12/time-to-revamp-wa-blog-point-system/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Bipin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsdecoded.com/?p=30#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Hi WA Blog Team,
You are doing an awesome job. The blog is popular and inviting some good posts. The PLOT system is well thought out. There is nothing like forced comment and it has also got nothing to do with the team size. No one does and can force anyone to post comments. However, you may consider ignoring irrelevant comments from the total count of comments. 
I don&#039;t think PLOT needs revision yet. Great job and keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi WA Blog Team,<br />
You are doing an awesome job. The blog is popular and inviting some good posts. The PLOT system is well thought out. There is nothing like forced comment and it has also got nothing to do with the team size. No one does and can force anyone to post comments. However, you may consider ignoring irrelevant comments from the total count of comments.<br />
I don&#8217;t think PLOT needs revision yet. Great job and keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael.fernando</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtsdecoded.com/2007/12/time-to-revamp-wa-blog-point-system/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>michael.fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsdecoded.com/?p=30#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Pankaj, I have to reiterate, no one can win because of the number of comments.

Thanks for your comment. Criticisms aren&#039;t wrong. This blog post was created with this sole purpose; so that you can all criticize the point system. That is the only way we can get to know the negatives in it. If you have a valid point, we will surely implement it into the point system.

Once again, your criticisms are welcome. You all are part of refining the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pankaj, I have to reiterate, no one can win because of the number of comments.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. Criticisms aren&#8217;t wrong. This blog post was created with this sole purpose; so that you can all criticize the point system. That is the only way we can get to know the negatives in it. If you have a valid point, we will surely implement it into the point system.</p>
<p>Once again, your criticisms are welcome. You all are part of refining the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pankaj sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtsdecoded.com/2007/12/time-to-revamp-wa-blog-point-system/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>pankaj sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsdecoded.com/?p=30#comment-254</guid>
		<description>@Pravina , Michael
I am not getting you wrong, you seriously doubted that we comment on blogs not written by our team mets. means you believe voting is biased.
The one having larger team size will get more comments.

Michael : I was not Criticizing the point system, it was just a suggestion not to include points for comments if its not fair enough.

I believe that you have the ability to  distinguish between forced, nonsensical and irrelevant comments but it can not change the number of comments.
If someone is getting more comments because of larger team size 
definitely he will get both relevant and irrelevant comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pravina , Michael<br />
I am not getting you wrong, you seriously doubted that we comment on blogs not written by our team mets. means you believe voting is biased.<br />
The one having larger team size will get more comments.</p>
<p>Michael : I was not Criticizing the point system, it was just a suggestion not to include points for comments if its not fair enough.</p>
<p>I believe that you have the ability to  distinguish between forced, nonsensical and irrelevant comments but it can not change the number of comments.<br />
If someone is getting more comments because of larger team size<br />
definitely he will get both relevant and irrelevant comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

